Airdate: 9/29/76
Sabrina’s initial meeting with Jim confirms that Frank is in
on the smuggling, but that due to a weird contract, the pilots/stewardesses
(Dan, Laurie) are powerless to press charges or investigate. But
Sabrina’s sixth sense alerts her that something’s “not right” about Jim – perhaps confirmed by his odd nonchalance to Bartone’s ire over Escobar’s admittance to the crash that started the whole thing. Jill goes even deeper; her friendship with Maria turns up distrust and resentment. Bartone later reveals further complicity: he refuses to shut down a heroin lab to make up for loss. (Sabrina and Jim Taylor go to the lab, which apparently is covered as a wine producer, and shuts them down.)
Sabrina’s sixth sense alerts her that something’s “not right” about Jim – perhaps confirmed by his odd nonchalance to Bartone’s ire over Escobar’s admittance to the crash that started the whole thing. Jill goes even deeper; her friendship with Maria turns up distrust and resentment. Bartone later reveals further complicity: he refuses to shut down a heroin lab to make up for loss. (Sabrina and Jim Taylor go to the lab, which apparently is covered as a wine producer, and shuts them down.)
Now, apparently, Escobar is upping the ante on the
smuggling/crashing thing – the Angels think the crash was meant to feign
incapacity on Bartone’s part, and to move in on them with Barone’s own
druglords. (I think.) Jill gets caught in the wine cellar; she reveals herself
to be Escobar’s agent, and sets up a meeting for both druglords to meet at a
marina in L.A. Escobar turns out to be Bosley, and a shootout ensures that
Bartone gets his just desserts. But who really is Escobar? Turns out to be Jim,
the pilot, but don’t worry – the Angels git him with their handbags. Phew!
Dude, some 70s pornstar wants his mustache back |
But having said that, it’s better than the other extreme:
stupid simple-minded fare, the likes of which are in no short supply on today’s
TV/cable
/Internet landscape. And also, is it any great sin to put the viewer to work? As crazily complex as this storyline is, it certainly didn’t bore me, owing to the usual assortment of teeth-gnashing villains and piquant supporting characters of dubious motive. And speaking of, ya gotta love that twist ending (I didn’t cal it), which plays up the “Whom can you trust?” theme in the great, grand Agatha Christie tradition. Too aggrandizing a comparison? C’mon, isn’t that what we’re looking at here: old time murder mysteries, replacing British mansions and teacups with L.A. streets and sun tan lotion?
/Internet landscape. And also, is it any great sin to put the viewer to work? As crazily complex as this storyline is, it certainly didn’t bore me, owing to the usual assortment of teeth-gnashing villains and piquant supporting characters of dubious motive. And speaking of, ya gotta love that twist ending (I didn’t cal it), which plays up the “Whom can you trust?” theme in the great, grand Agatha Christie tradition. Too aggrandizing a comparison? C’mon, isn’t that what we’re looking at here: old time murder mysteries, replacing British mansions and teacups with L.A. streets and sun tan lotion?
Let’s start a new feature, a plot comprehension difficulty rating,
only because I’m curious how the other episodes compare to this one in that
regard. I’m calling this one a…
PCDR: 10 (easily)
I hope they get easier. Don’t have time for multiple
viewings.
No comments:
Post a Comment