Before Lynda Carter got that phone call informing her she’d
be America’s favorite bullet-deflecting, satin tight wearing super she-ro, she
starred in this cheapie flick produced by American International Studios. This
outfit basically produced every exploitation flick from the 69s and 70s; back
then they were mainly shown in drive-ins, usually as double features, where
teen audiences were not so discriminating (for obvious reasons). Bobbie Jo and the Oulaw is a perfect
example of this particular strain of cheapie – in 1976, fast cars, drugs and
boobs were necessary ingredients, and thanks to films like Bonnie and Clyde and Robert Altman’s Thieves Like Us, rebel outlaws were too. And one other element was
rising in popularity – the small-bit country singer who’s got his/her sight on
being a star. Here that's represented by Lynda Carter, who gets a chance to
showcase her singing chops, albeit just briefly.
So the plot is nothing at all special, but here’s a quick
recap: Lyle Wheeler (Marjoe Gortner), who fancies himself a fast draw in the
tradition of Billy the Kid, swipes the car of a leather salesman, and from
there takes the life of an outlaw, beguiling a fresh faced drive-in waitress
named Bobbie Jo (Carter) in the process. One act of crime leads to another, and
before long, the duo become a fivesome, now including Bobbie’s best friend
Essie (Belinda Balaski), sister Pearl (Merrie Lynn Ross), and Pearl’s boyfriend
Slick (Jessie Vint). The band vows to defend each other to the death, with the
exception of Essie, who notifies the cops of their whereabouts; she gets shot
by the cops in the ensuing crossfire, strengthening the rest of the group’s
resolve to continue their criminal ways. Of course, it all comes down to a
standoff in a motel room – the cops have the place surrounded, and riddle Lyle
and his gang with bullets. Only Bobbie survives… maybe she’ll get to the Grand Ol’
Opry after all.
Loaded with clichés and rife with pretty low production
values, Bobbie is, nonetheless,
surprisingly entertaining for its ilk, in part because its writing is fairly
crisp and convincing, and well-acted to boot. Lyle’s character feels fresh and
interesting, despite being based on so many other film archetypes. His actions
come with mantra – from his attitude toward stealing and killing (only in self
defense, otherwise it’s evil) to death itself, evidenced by his eulogy for
Essie. Carter also does an interesting job transforming her character from one
of goo-eyed adoration for Lyle, to skepticism of his shady ways, to addiction
to their lifestyle together and ultimate glee for the crimes she helps commit.
If the film has any major flaw, it’s probably the absence of
a rooting interest. The film does seem to side with Lyle, as the cops tend to
be brutal pigs whereas Lyle does have a vague moral code. But quite frankly I
wanted him captured pretty early on. Part of the brilliance in Bonnie and Clyde was the way it got you
to like these two bank robbers, and
then pull the rug out from under you when they perish in a hail of gunfire at
the end (still a shocker).
All right, all right – by now you’re wondering, how are
Lynda Carter’s nude scenes. Just remember this was still 1976, so they didn’t
go too far (this isn’t Skinemax after all). There is one darkly-lit shot of
topless lovemaking, but you see it only from the side, and only briefly.
(Evidently they could only get Carter to do this once, so they literally used
the same shot again later in a different scene.) So in a nutshell: only fair.
But for my money it’s Balaski who puts in a better show. Not only does she do
the lion’s share of nudity (especially in the “magic mushroom” skinny-dipping
scene), but she plays a delightfully appealing, quirky character that presages
some of her later film work, particularly that with director Joe Dante.
This may be a tough film to find, but if you can locate it,
it’s worth 86 minutes of your time, if for nothing else than as a trip back in time. Afternoon delight, anyone?
I saw this movie (censored for US TV) as an Afternoon Movie a LONG time ago. Most of the -er- "best parts" were missing. I saw it again in the early 2000's on a Canadian cable channel, Drive-In Classics. It was my favourite channel EVER! It had it all...Creature Features, Kung-fu, Blaxploitation, Steamy Windshields (sexploitation), Before They Were Stars, goofy hosts & everything else a lover of cheeeeeese would want. And totally uncensored!!! Sadly, it's been gone for over a decade now. Here's a promo for Drive-in Classics (R.I.P.) that hopefully didn't embed. Sorry if it did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUhwkqJd8Fw
ReplyDelete"I've heard of the meat shortage, but that's ridiculous!" Ha-Ha-Ha!
Anyway, the movie wasn't exactly Oscar-worthy, but it was surprisingly good for a movie with such a low budget. It's certainly great entertainment value per dollar spent. You're right, it was one of those 70's anti-hero films where the protagonists weren't meant as heroes, but flawed humans. Your sympathies are either divided on, or change during the movie. That's REALLY hard to pull off, especially as a drive-in movie where the audiences -uh- may not be paying 100% attention. It's FAR easier to make you hate, or even love villains (Bonnie & Clyde). But this movie managed that difficult balance reasonably well.
As you indicated, the weakest part of the film was probably the failure to get their Wonderous Woman lead to -er- do a second, (3rd, 4th...or 17th) properly lit, love scene. She looked uncomfortable/bashful at times. A slightly bigger budget may have solved that problem. How could more of Lynda Carter NOT pull in audiences??? I'm sure she could convince most men to go on a crime spree for her.
Anonymous - That cable channel sounds like something I'd love! I agree with your observation about the antihero - and DEFINITELY about Carter's lack of exposure, shall we say. Well, at least it's something, even if the film is something she'd rather not include on her resume.
ReplyDelete